2D Code Marking Method Comparison
What follows is a comparison of three different marking methods for 2D code.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bc103/bc103bb0f7450ef353503674a183c45c0bec3351" alt=""
Dot-Peen is a “low resolution marking method. A single dot defines each cell. The grade of the mark is determined by the quality of the filled cells. Poorly filled cells result in poorly read marks.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09353/09353465e01dca102d7eabe35be8f62be50348ea" alt=""
Square-Dot is a patented process by CMT. Each cell is scribed. The scribed squares fill the cell and result in a higher resolution mark and better reading and verification by cameras. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48671/48671cbfa352a4800389d6edccc0a110120ba333" alt=""
The highest resolution Direct Part Marking method is laser. The fine precision of the laser marking allows for the smallest cell size and the smallest possible 2D code size. |
If you have further questions or would like a quotation, please give us a call at 586-949-8400. Or e-mail quotes@columbiamt.com.